Why would you not always use WPF rather than Windows Forms? The main issue is that the time you save on figuring out scaling is more than consumed by the time you spend on design. As with Windows Forms, there is deep support for binding data to controls. The underlying presentation language is based on XAML, an XML language. Scaling is built-in and based on layout managers. Unlike Windows Forms, it is based on the DirectX graphics API, so great for multimedia and special effects. NET Framework 3.0 in 2006, part of the Vista wave of technology. NET and in many respects a great improvement. This was Microsoft’s second go at a GUI framework for. It is also because, scaling issues aside, Windows Forms is reliable, well supported by both built-in and third-party controls, and easy to learn. Why is Windows Forms still in use? It is partly legacy and the fact that it is easier to maintain and enhance an existing application than to start again. However the ability to bind list and grid controls to any kind of. I am not a fan of this database framework, which quickly gets convoluted, but you do not have to use it. If you are writing a database application, you can generate datasets by drag and drop from the Server Explorer in Visual Studio and bind them to controls. And then read about High DPI support, which was improved again in. Read this carefully if you use Windows Forms. It does kind-of scale if you follow certain rules, but successful scaling in a Windows Forms application is often difficult to achieve, so users may suffer chopped-off controls and text, or just ugly screens. This is great if you are designing and running on the same PC, but not so good when you deploy to other PCs with different display settings. In other words, you can think of your form as a grid of pixels with the position of your controls determined at design time by its size and coordinates. Windows Forms is a nice wrapper around the Windows API, and easy to use in that it uses essentially X Y layout. NET 4.5.2, reflecting the fact that this ancient framework is still widely used. In 2014, High DPI support was improved, with. That said, Microsoft intended it to be replaced by Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF, see below), so it has not been a focus of attention. Of course it has been revised many times since. This is the framework for Windows desktop applications that was introduced at the same time as. NET (which is a great choice for a Windows-only application, and with the possibility of migrating code to cross-platform via Xamarin’s compiler later), then you have three obvious choices: Windows Forms Let us even assume that they all run Windows 10 so that UWP (Universal Windows Platform) is a realistic option. So when a business comes to you and says, we want a new Windows application to do this or that, and presuming they do not care about mobile or Macs or access over the internet but just want something that runs on their internal network, what framework do you choose? Yes, mobile is the future of client applications, cross-platform is cool, web applications are amazing but out there in the real world, there are still a ton of people who work all day with a Windows PC, and businesses that want PC applications in order to get their work done.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |